[cfe-dev] [clang-tidy][RFC] Add Autosar C++14 clang-tidy module?

[Demi Marie Obenour via cfe-dev]

On 11/8/21 1:33 PM, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:15 PM Danny Mösch <accountdm at icloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8. Nov 2021, at 14:56, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
>>> Licensing questions aside, one practical reason is because the MISRA
>>> guidelines are not freely available, so it's basically impossible to
>>> perform code reviews for such checkers unless you already own a copy
>>> of MISRA. The rest of the community then has to take it on faith that
>>> the check actually does what the MISRA rule says it should do because
>>> they have no way to verify.
>>
>> What I conclude from that is that even if some people would work on a module for MISRA rules, the possibility is quite low that it will be accepted by the LLVM community for understandable reasons. Am I right about that?
> 
> That's my take on it. As a code reviewer, I wouldn't be able to
> validate the check against the rules it means to implement (at least,
> not without some licensing-related questions that I wouldn't really
> want to get involved with in the first place).

What are those questions?

Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4874 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20211109/72a9bdb9/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20211109/72a9bdb9/attachment-0001.sig>