[cfe-dev] [RFC] Having different behavior for __fp16 on RISC-V
Kito Cheng via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 5 00:23:47 PST 2021
RISC-V has a draft extension for half-precision proposed last year[1],
so we think adding a new type for that would be great to make this
easier to use that extension.
We found there is _Float16 and __fp16 types are supported on GCC and
Clang, but _Float16 has C++ supporting issues on GCC site, so we think
support both types is a reasonable choice to us.
However we would like have slight different behavior for __fp16 other
than ACLE: The evaluation format of __fp16 set same as _Float16,
which means no promotion are performed if there is no hardware
half-precision
supported.
The only concern to us is it's defined differnt with clang's document,
so we would put this RFC patch here, to make sure it's OK for make
__fp16 has differnt behavior between differnt targets.
This patch contains document change only, implementation would be in
other patches.
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/pull/496
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/172
Corresponding phabricator entry for this RFC:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98012
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20210305/0c86fabf/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list