[cfe-dev] [RFC] New file extension for compiling C++ for OpenCL sources

[Anastasia Stulova via cfe-dev]

I am not aware of non-clang implementations of OpenCL kernel language
parsing. There are some forks of clang customizing the default behaviour
though. But I am not aware of any customizing that specific functionality.


________________________________
From: cfe-dev <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Andrzej Warzynski via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Sent: 16 February 2021 16:42
To: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC] New file extension for compiling C++ for OpenCL sources

Is there any prior art? As in, what other compilers do? Or is Clang the
precursor here?

-Andrzej

On 16/02/2021 16:27, MLJ1991 via cfe-dev wrote:
> That seems like a good compromise
>
>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:26 AM, Anastasia Stulova
>> <Anastasia.Stulova at arm.com <mailto:Anastasia.Stulova at arm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! I see, I think .cl was meant to represent Compute Language as
>> in OpenCL, I would somehow find it better if we don't split cl... I
>> think that "cl" indicates more intuitively that it is OpenCL specific
>> file. We could however use cppcl?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:*MLJ1991 <marcusljohnson1991 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:marcusljohnson1991 at gmail.com>>
>> *Sent:*16 February 2021 16:08
>> *To:*Anastasia Stulova <Anastasia.Stulova at arm.com
>> <mailto:Anastasia.Stulova at arm.com>>
>> *Cc:*clang developer list <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>; nd <nd at arm.com <mailto:nd at arm.com>>;
>> Sven Van Haastregt <Sven.VanHaastregt at arm.com
>> <mailto:Sven.VanHaastregt at arm.com>>
>> *Subject:*Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC] New file extension for compiling C++ for
>> OpenCL sources
>> I mean, if .cl is the OpenCL C extension, logically the C++ extension
>> should be .cxxl or .cppl
>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 7:41 AM, Anastasia Stulova via cfe-dev
>>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Up to now, we have used the same file extension for OpenCL C and C++
>>> for OpenCL
>>> (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cxx-for-opencl
>>> <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cxx-for-opencl>). But
>>> to keep
>>> consistency with the clang driver interface, it makes more sense that
>>> C++ for OpenCL
>>> has a different extension from OpenCL C. Mirroring C and C++ it would
>>> be logical to
>>> support the following:
>>>
>>> .cl - OpenCL C source file
>>> .clcpp - C++ for OpenCL source file
>>>
>>> I would like to share the review that adds a new file extension for
>>> C++ for OpenCL with
>>> a wider audiencehttps://reviews.llvm.org/D96771
>>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96771>. Feel free to provide us any feedback
>>> regarding the direction or implementation details.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Anastasia
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>> <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20210216/27671d61/attachment-0001.html>