[cfe-dev] clang-format custom format specification
Sam McCall via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 16 01:05:31 PDT 2020
Hi Kyle,
A similar feature has been proposed: allowing -style to refer to a
filename. Could be style=file:<path> which is pretty close...
I guess it's a little clumsier for the user (and a little less work for the
style authors) than what you propose. But it's simple, which is worth
something - I don't like the idea of adding things to the format file
itself to facilitate this.
And it would satisfy your goal around error-reporting: -style=foobar fails
with "Invalid value for -style" and a nonexistent file could do the same.
The patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D50147 got stalled over whether the
files should be searched for relative to some predefined search path. I
think a version that handled absolute or working-dir-relative paths would
be uncontroversial. Would this work for you?
cc Typz who wrote that patch and Mydeveloperday who is the most active
clang-format maintainer.
Cheers, Sam
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:28 AM Kyle Knoepfel via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Forgive me if this has already been discussed.
>
> I work on projects with different formatting guidelines. For simple
> cases, it is simple to embed the .clang-format file in the correct (parent)
> directory, run `clang-format -style=file ...` and everyone's happy.
> However, it is easy to get into a situation where the wrong format is
> applied, especially if you accidentally invoke the command from the wrong
> directory.
>
> Would Clang be opposed to a specification like:
>
> clang-format -style=custom:my-projects-format ...
>
> where a field in the .clang-format file would have the value
> 'my-projects-format', thus attributing the file to the format name? If a
> user specified something like -style=custom:my-unsupported-format, and such
> a format name could not be discovered in the .clang-format file, then it
> would be a hard failure, not letting a silent error slip by.
>
> Thanks for your input. If it is favorable, then I'm happy to explore
> implementing it.
>
> Kyle Knoepfel
>
> Software framework group leader, Fermilab
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20200916/7f33c801/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list