[cfe-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via cfe-dev]

Any news regarding false-negatives?

+Mitch Phillips <mitchp at google.com>

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Vitaly.
> Somebody is looking at this.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>
>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is some issue, at least on staging.
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
>>> stages but marked as SUCCESS
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging
>>>>> area! Much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the
>>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Galina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>>>>>> frequently offline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>>>>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They do on staging.
>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's
>>>>>>>>> OK for now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
>>>>>>>>>> build bot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
>>>>>>>>>>> <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
>>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier.
>>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things
>>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
>>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
>>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
>>>>>>>>>>> of the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
>>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201027/edae2788/attachment.html>