[cfe-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via cfe-dev]

Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
frequently offline.


On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks everyone!
>
> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
> move all the green bots back there.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> They do on staging.
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>
>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>> annotated commands:
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for
>>> now.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should
>>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
>>>> bot.
>>>>
>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Galina
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>>>>> script.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201015/628b95bb/attachment.html>