[cfe-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via cfe-dev]

I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> They do on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>
> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
>> commands:
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for
>> now.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should
>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
>>>
>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>
>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>>>> script.
>>>>
>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201014/327f57ee/attachment-0001.html>