[cfe-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Reid Kleckner via cfe-dev]

FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
commands:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
wrote:

> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be
> a functional equivalent of the old one.
> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
>
> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand
> directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>
> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> They are online now -
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>
>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will
>>> need more love and care.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>
>>
>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>> script.
>>
>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some
>> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201013/fe9db856/attachment-0001.html>