[cfe-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via cfe-dev]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:01, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Vitaly!
>
> Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we?
>

We can do that.


>
> Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3,
> sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please?
>

Done.


> AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good.
> My only concern at this point is how it would handle a heavy load, so the
> more bots we will have on the staging the better.
>
> If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging
> area, that would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:45 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see
>> which one is green.
>> Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging.
>> Thank you!
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same
>>> script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux.
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should
>>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
>>>> bot.
>>>>
>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Galina
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>>>>> script.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201013/e8010acd/attachment-0001.html>