[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [RFC] Backend for Motorola 6800 series CPU (M68k)

[Renato Golin via cfe-dev]

On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 15:04, Jessica Clarke via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> I continue to believe M680x0 is a mistake. Your own patch series uses
> "[M68K]". The triple name is m68k-linux-gnu etc. Everyone calls it either
> m68k or just 68k.. As for GCC there are only four instances of m680x0: 3 in
> install.texi and 1 in m68k.md, but the port is gcc/config/m68k. So please
> let's not use this name for LLVM; it's longer, more confusing and just
> generally clumsy in comparison to the de-facto standard that everyone knows
> (even this thread's subject has "(M68k)" in the subject, acknowledging that
> that's a name people recognise).


Agreed, with everything! m68k is the only sane option.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201010/bc9adb47/attachment.html>