[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [RFC] Backend for Motorola 6800 series CPU (M68k)

[Simon Pilgrim via cfe-dev]

Its awesome to see so much progress on this!

A very minor question - why is it called M680x0 and not M68K given 
that's what the target arch/triple is and how its usually referred to?

Sorry for the bikeshedding....

Simon.

On 30/09/2020 21:14, Min-Yih Hsu via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've composed a draft roadmap for this new target. I've decided to try 
> Github's "Projects" feature, as it provides a clearer view to see all 
> the blockers and action items, IMAO. Here is the link:
> https://github.com/M680x0/M680x0-mono-repo/projects 
> <https://github.com/M680x0/M680x0-mono-repo/projects>
>
> Currently I only created two major milestones: Becoming an 
> experimental target and becoming an official target. For each 
> milestone, I've listed the expected features, estimated time frame 
> (though I'm not really confident on that), and most importantly, the 
> blockers for the milestone.
> Fortunately, all of our essential features are complete (e.g. ISel, 
> MC), so there will be more house cleaning tasks and bug fixing than 
> adding new features in the second milestone.
>
> In addition to the aforementioned two milestones, I've added "be able 
> to run toy programs" as a separate milestone to accommodate some more 
> urgent tasks right now. More specifically, driver problems that make 
> Clang unable to leverage all our components.
>
> Thank you!
> Min
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:27 AM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rengolin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 18:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>     <glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
>     <mailto:glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de>> wrote:
>
>         So, shall we setup a server for that or is there some existing
>         infrastructure
>         from LLVM that is used in this case?
>
>
>     Unfortunately, we don't have a centralised infrastructure like
>     GCC. Each target community is responsible for maintaining their
>     own buildbots.
>
>     All we provide is the "build master", which aggregates all builds,
>     email when there are regressions, etc.
>
>     http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html
>     <http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html>
>
>     It should be trivial to copy & paste an existing bot config and
>     change to add the experimental hardware (once it's in the tree).
>
>     Pay attention to the version of buildbot you install, as using an
>     even slightly different version can cause weird errors.
>
>     (I'm sure you understand how many times we tried to move on for
>     the past 10 years... :)
>
>
>         As far as I understand, 90% of the tests already pass
>         (according to Min).
>
>
>     Awesome! We have buildbots with test-suite running, you can copy
>     those, too. There were some QEMU bots in the past, I'm not sure
>     they're around, but the infra to run them should still be there.
>
>     cheers,
>     --renato
>
>
>
> -- 
> Min-Yih Hsu
> Ph.D Student in ICS Department, University of California, Irvine (UCI).
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20201001/3a3b5d20/attachment-0001.html>