[cfe-dev] RFC: Easier AST Matching by Default

[Stephen Kelly via cfe-dev]

On 17/06/2020 23:49, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> Yes, I see your point. The current state doesn't account well for this 
> case.
>
> Would it resolve the problem if the CXXConstructExpr was not excluded 
> in this case (in the initializer of a VarDecl), assuming that can be 
> implemented?
>
This is implemented here:

https://reviews.llvm.org/D82278

Thanks,

Stephen.