[cfe-dev] RFC: Easier AST Matching by Default

Stephen Kelly via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 21 07:34:42 PDT 2020

On 17/06/2020 23:49, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Yes, I see your point. The current state doesn't account well for this 
> case.
> Would it resolve the problem if the CXXConstructExpr was not excluded 
> in this case (in the initializer of a VarDecl), assuming that can be 
> implemented?
This is implemented here:




More information about the cfe-dev mailing list