[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Spell out ENTO in clang::ento

Gábor Horváth via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 20 11:49:38 PDT 2020

I do not have a strong opinion on the name of the namespace but I do agree
with Aaron. A 2 letter namespace would not be a big improvement over ento.
What about analyzer?


On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 19:39, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:35 PM Balázs Benics via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In my opinion this is a great example of bad and meaningless naming.
> "ento" says nothing to a newcomer, neither to experienced folks. I'd rather
> rename the namespace simply to sa (Static Analyzer).
> > I strongly share your suggestion. I would love a sensible namespace.
> >
> > Folks, please share your thoughts on this.
> I have no issues renaming ento to something that's more clear, but I
> have a hard time agreeing that sa adds enough clarity over ento to be
> worth the churn to the code base.
> ~Aaron
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20200820/38eb872b/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list