[cfe-dev] Invalid code in PthreadLockChecker
Artem Dergachev via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 30 11:45:09 PDT 2019
Some of these functions do actually take two arguments, eg.:
int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t *mutex, const pthread_mutexattr_t
*attr).
We might not query these arguments because they aren't of interest to
the checker, but they still exist in the code.
That said, if you're interested in improving this part of the checker,
you may try to convert it to CallDescriptionMap which is more specific
and less fragile.
On 10/30/19 3:52 AM, kamlesh kumar via cfe-dev wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> I was going through Clang/Static Analyser in particular
> PthreadLockChecker.
> There I have find this line
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp#L115
>
> which I think could be modified like this
> if (CE->getNumArgs() !=1)
> return;
>
> since all of the lock/unlock/destroy function is having only single arguments.
> Even a simple grep shows that only CE->getArg(0) is used in the
> particular source file.
> Please clarify on this.
>
> ./Kamlesh
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20191030/9a8eff8a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list