[cfe-dev] missing -Wuninitialized warnings with OpenMP
Zakharin, Vyacheslav P via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 25 15:16:54 PDT 2019
Good! I submitted 42392<https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42392>.
Thanks,
Slava
From: Finkel, Hal J. [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:00 PM
To: Zakharin, Vyacheslav P <vyacheslav.p.zakharin at intel.com>; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] missing -Wuninitialized warnings with OpenMP
On 6/24/19 3:27 PM, Zakharin, Vyacheslav P via cfe-dev wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to get appropriate -Wuninitialized warnings with OpenMP for the following cases?
int reduction(int *input) {
int i, r;
#pragma omp target parallel for map(to: input) reduction(+: r)
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
r += input[i];
return r;
}
int linear() {
int i, r;
#pragma omp target parallel for linear(r)
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
r += 1;
return r;
}
void firstprivate(int *input) {
int r;
#pragma omp target firstprivate(r) map(tofrom: input[0:1])
*input = r;
}
It compiles silently with -fopenmp, but the errors become obvious w/o it:
warn.c:5:5: warning: variable 'r' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
warn.c:14:5: warning: variable 'r' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
warn.c:21:12: warning: variable 'r' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
Is it worth a tracker?
Yes, I think that filing a bug would be useful.
Thanks again,
Hal
Thanks,
Slava
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
--
Hal Finkel
Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20190625/98f6c735/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list