[cfe-dev] RFC: Interface user provided vector functions with the vectorizer.

[Francesco Petrogalli via cfe-dev]

> On Jun 24, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Tian, Xinmin <xinmin.tian at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> To me, it is also an issue related to SIMD signature matching when the vectorizer kicks in. Losing info from FE to BE is not good in general.
>  

Yes, we cannot loose such information. In particular, the three examples I reported are all generating i64 in the scalar function signature:

// Type 1
typedef _Complex int S;

// Type 2 
typedef struct x{
int a;
int b;
} S;

// Type 3
typedef uint64_t S;

S foo(S a, S b) {
return ...;
}


On AArch64, the correspondent vector function signature in the three cases would be (for 2-lane unmasked vectorization):

// Type 1:

<4 x int> vectorized_foo(<4 x int>, <4 x int>)

// Type 2:

%a = type struct {I 32, i32}

<2 x %a* > vectorized_foo(<2 x %a*> , <2 x %a*>)

// Type 3:

<2 x i64> vectorized_foo(<2 x i64>, <2 x i64)

To make sure that the vectorizer knows how to map the scalar function parameters to the vector ones, we have to make sure that the original signature  information is stored somewhere.

I will work on this, and provide examples.

Suggestions are welcome.

Thank you

Francesco