[cfe-dev] C++2a default-constructible and assignable lambdas

[David Blaikie via cfe-dev]

Yeah, your reading sounds right to me.

Richard?

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:10 AM Logan Smith via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Salutations all -- brand-new, aspiring Clang hacker here.
>
> In spelunking through AST/DeclCXX.cpp to familiarize myself with things, I
> stumbled upon the implementation
> of CXXRecordDecl::lambdaIsDefaultConstructibleAndAssignable(). It -- very
> conveniently -- cites the C++2a draft as per new rules involving lambda
> default construction and assignment:
>
>   C++2a [expr.prim.lambda.capture]p11:
>     The closure type associated with a lambda-expression has no default
>     constructor if the lambda-expression has a lambda-capture and a
>     defaulted default constructor otherwise. It has a deleted copy
>     assignment operator if the lambda-expression has a lambda-capture and
>     defaulted copy and move assignment operators otherwise.
>
> By my reading, if a lambda has any captures whatsoever, its default
> constructor and copy assignment operators are deleted. However, the
> implementation in clang appears to only check for the presence of
> `capture-default`s:
>
>   if (getLambdaCaptureDefault() != LCD_None)
>     return false;
>   return getASTContext().getLangOpts().CPlusPlus2a;
>
> In fact, the commit where this feature was introduced (864949bda1db) very
> explicitly only provides for lambdas with `capture-default's. This leads
> the following code to be (erroneously, by my reading) accepted by clang
> with -std=c++2a:
>
>     void f(int i) {
>         auto lam1 = [i] {};
>         decltype(lam1) lam2;
>     }
>
> while the following is (correctly) rejected:
>
>     void f(int i) {
>         auto lam1 = [=] {};
>         decltype(lam1) lam2;
>     }
>
> My question is: is the current implementation 1) intentional, and 2)
> correct?
>
> -- logan
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20190701/67565505/attachment.html>