[cfe-dev] Tooling RFC: Find build root from source root with a symlink?
Sam McCall via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 11 10:11:46 PDT 2018
(I put a basic implementation in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53145 in case
anyone is curious what this would look like)
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:41 PM Sam McCall <sammccall at google.com> wrote:
> Many projects/build systems have the concept of a "build tree" that can be
> separate from the source tree. (e.g. CMake supports this, and LLVM
> recommends this approach).
>
> Tools sometimes need to find the build tree.
> I'd like to suggest a convention for the Tooling library to support:
> If $SRC/buildroot exists, it's the default build directory for the
> source tree $SRC.
> Otherwise, the build directory is $SRC itself.
> $SRC/buildroot may be a symlink.
> Configuration files like compile_commands.json are searched for in the
> build directory.
> (Bikeshedding the "buildroot" string is welcome. "build" will conflict too
> often, sadly).
>
> Implications:
> - for /foo/bar/baz.cc, we'd search for compile_commands.json in
> {/foo/bar/buildroot/,/foo/bar/, /foo/buildroot/, etc}. This is
> backwards-compatible.
> - where users currently symlink compile_commands.json itself, they could
> create the buildroot symlink instead. This would work in the same way, and
> enable new cases.
> - if we implement e.g. a Ninja-backed compilation DB that doesn't need
> compile_commands.json, the same symlink convention would work.
> - it provides a simple model for multi-configuration-aware tools: a
> configuration is defined by a build dir, there's a default configuration,
> tools can let the user override the build dir. e.g. clangd can write its
> index files into the build dir instead of the source dir, which is
> multi-configuration-friendly (tinyurl.com/clangd-automatic-index)
> - non-clang tools that consume compile_commands.json will need to be
> updated over time.
>
> What do you think?
> Cheers, Sam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20181011/720a7b4d/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list