[cfe-dev] [OpenMP]: wrong threadprivate storage name in task reduction
Alexey Bataev via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 8 06:30:45 PST 2018
Hi,
>>> Anyway, this implementation of task reductions is not fully
functional, as only are allowed if the task is created in the scope of
taskgroup.
What do you mean?Could you provide some more detais?
-------------
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
08.03.2018 7:47, Raúl Peñacoba пишет:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did some little research and I have realized that the patch I
> attached doesn't fix the problem completely. I fixed the storage of
> the data. When a using task reduction with vla, or a class that uses
> omp_orig to initialize the private copies, the size of the vla and
> omp_orig are stored in a storage using __kmpc_threadprivate_cached().
>
> The problem comes because, since in outline parallel function each
> reduction has lazy_priv flag, the initialization will be done in
> __kmpc_task_reduction_get_th_data(), called from outline task
> function. This is done _before_storing the vla size or omp_orig, so
> the initialization would be wrong in these cases.
>
> I think that if the storage is put before the
> __kmpc_task_reduction_get_th_data() it should work.
>
> Anyway, this implementation of task reductions is not fully
> functional, as only are allowed if the task is created in the scope of
> taskgroup.
>
> Sorry for the mail duplicate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raúl
>
> El 06/03/18 a las 16:21, Alexey Bataev escribió:
>>
>> Hi, thanks for the report, I'll take a look.
>>
>> -------------
>> Best regards,
>> Alexey Bataev
>> 06.03.2018 4:25, Raúl Peñacoba via cfe-dev пишет:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've noticed that clang does not work properly when using task
>>> reductions with non-constant arrays and/or classes with omp_orig
>>> constructor initializers.
>>>
>>> As reduction initialize/combine/finalize functions only receive
>>> references to whatever should be initialized, combined..., clang
>>> generates some additional storages to save the size of the reduction
>>> array and a pointer to the omp_orig. That storages are generated
>>> through __kmpc_thread_private_cached() calls in both reduction
>>> functions and outline task function.
>>>
>>> The problem is that the storage used in outline task function does
>>> not match the storage in reduction functions. This happens in
>>> programs that have a task reduction or a taskloop reduction with the
>>> in_reduction clause.
>>>
>>> To solve this i made an ugly patch that reuses the SourceLocation of
>>> CodeGenFunction::EmitOMPTaskgroupDirective() in
>>> CodeGenFunction::EmitOMPTaskBasedDirective() to match the storages
>>> and make it work. Anyway, i suppose that there is a better way to
>>> fix this.
>>>
>>> Index: CGStmtOpenMP.cpp
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- CGStmtOpenMP.cpp (revision 326685)
>>> +++ CGStmtOpenMP.cpp (working copy)
>>> @@ -2713,6 +2713,8 @@
>>> emitEmptyBoundParameters);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static SourceLocation reductionLoc;
>>> +
>>> void CodeGenFunction::EmitOMPTaskBasedDirective(
>>> const OMPExecutableDirective &S, const OpenMPDirectiveKind
>>> CapturedRegion,
>>> const RegionCodeGenTy &BodyGen, const TaskGenTy &TaskGen,
>>> @@ -2952,7 +2954,7 @@
>>> // FIXME: This must removed once the runtime library is fixed.
>>> // Emit required threadprivate variables for
>>> // initilizer/combiner/finalizer.
>>> - CGF.CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().emitTaskReductionFixups(CGF,
>>> S.getLocStart(),
>>> + CGF.CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().emitTaskReductionFixups(CGF,
>>> reductionLoc,
>>> RedCG, Cnt);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> @@ -3180,8 +3182,9 @@
>>> std::advance(IRHS, 1);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> + reductionLoc = S.getLocStart();
>>> llvm::Value *ReductionDesc =
>>> - CGF.CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().emitTaskReductionInit(CGF,
>>> S.getLocStart(),
>>> + CGF.CGM.getOpenMPRuntime().emitTaskReductionInit(CGF,
>>> reductionLoc,
>>> LHSs, RHSs, Data);
>>> const auto *VD = cast<VarDecl>(cast<DeclRefExpr>(E)->getDecl());
>>> CGF.EmitVarDecl(*VD);
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Raúl
>>>
>>>
>>> http://bsc.es/disclaimer
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> WARNING / LEGAL TEXT: This message is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information which is privileged, confidential, proprietary, or exempt
> from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing,
> distributing, copying, or in any way using this message. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify the sender and
> destroy and delete any copies you may have received.
>
> http://www.bsc.es/disclaimer
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bsc.es%2Fdisclaimer&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2a787fae16d1409fb12808d584f2b8da%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636561100369995188&sdata=Qg460eDN4kZxnL4NIiP06MjaE85rnbyx2M%2FyVR7jif8%3D&reserved=0>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180308/59f1b680/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180308/59f1b680/attachment.sig>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list