[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in
Jonas Hahnfeld via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 5 08:30:19 PST 2018
From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they
don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what
would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?
Regards,
Jonas
Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:
> It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't
> uniform among the libraries produced by the release. Some use
> $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none. Is this by design? It seems
> like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way.
> If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.
>
> $ for f in
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do echo
> $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
> readelf: Error:
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so: Failed
> to read file header
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.
>>
>> 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
>> 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
>> ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear testers,
>>>
>>> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
>>> after
>>> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
>>> one
>>> small x86 fix (r326393).
>>>
>>> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.
>>>
>>> For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
>>> it
>>> will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
>>> on
>>> the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
>>> ready.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!
>>>
>>> Hans
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [1]
>>
>> --
>> -Brian
>
> --
> -Brian
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list