[cfe-dev] Test failuire: Driver/baremetal.cpp
David A. Greene via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 26 10:11:59 PDT 2018
Yes, that's fine by me. We don't have a cross-linker gold, so I want to
make sure this isn't testing that a cross-linker is found.
-David
Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if this test really needs to depend on lld. Maybe you can
> replace `ld.lld` with `ld` so that the test passes for any linker?
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:21 AM David Greene via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I've configured clang to use gold, which seems to cause
> test/Driver/baremetal.cpp to fail. The test works like this:
>
> // RUN: %clang -no-canonical-prefixes %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 \
> // RUN: -target armv6m-none-eabi \
> // RUN: -T semihosted.lds \
> // RUN: -L some/directory/user/asked/for \
> // RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/baremetal_arm \
> // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-V6M-C %s
> // CHECK-V6M-C: "[[PREFIX_DIR:.*]]{{[/\\]+}}{{[^/^\\]+}}
> {{[/\\]+}}clang{{.*}}" "-cc1" "-triple" "thumbv6m-none--eabi"
> // CHECK-V6M-C-SAME: "-resource-dir" "[[RESOURCE_DIR:[^"]+]]"
> // CHECK-V6M-C-SAME: "-isysroot" "[[SYSROOT:[^"]*]]"
> // CHECK-V6M-C-SAME: "-internal-isystem" "[[SYSROOT]]
> {{[/\\]+}}include{{[/\\]+}}c++{{[/\\]+}}v1"
> // CHECk-V6M-C-SAME: "-internal-isystem" "[[SYSROOT]]
> {{[/\\]+}}include"
> // CHECK-V6M-C-SAME: "-x" "c++" "{{.*}}baremetal.cpp"
> // CHECK-V6M-C-NEXT: "{{[^"]*}}ld.lld{{(\.exe)?}}" "{{.*}}.o"
> "-Bstatic"
>
> The NEXT line is problematic as it assumes ld.lld. I did not build
> lld,
> though I could simply to get the test working. But building lld is
> not
> enough as I configured with CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=gold. It seems
> like
> the RUN line needs -fuse-ld=lld.
>
> Is there a REQUIRES clause for lld being present and default? I
> could
> not find somthing appropriate in lit's config.available_features.
>
> It's certainly possible I'm doing something wrong, as I assume
> many
> people use gold with clang. Maybe those people don't run the
> tests?
>
> I am happy to update the test if someone can point me to a good
> REQUIRES
> clause.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -David
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list