[cfe-dev] Tidy vs Warnings: missing override

[Jonas Toth via cfe-dev]

Hi,

I experience the override-warning when it was inconsistent within the
class (meaning it has been used at least once and some places missed
it). This measure is probably to not warn on old code bases.

Could this be the case?

Best, Jonas


Am 09.08.2018 um 19:26 schrieb JVApen via cfe-dev:
> Hello all,
>
> Today we have discovered a case where we did not have a compiler
> warning for a missing override. To verify, we explicitly enabled the
> warning with the pragma.
>
> While investigating this in the IDE, we noticed that the Visual Assist
> plugin did notice that missing override. As this uses clang-tidy to
> determine this, we were wondering if these differences we noticed are
> intentional. If so, is their any documentation on these differences?
>
> Tnx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180810/95abbef7/attachment.html>