[cfe-dev] Should clang-tidys 'use-after-move' consider std::forward

[Martin Böhme via cfe-dev]

Interesting point -- I don't recall offhand, but I assume this isn't
currently handled and should be added.

On 14 September 2017 at 13:53, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:

> +Martin
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:19 PM Jonas Toth via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> when reading the code for `misc-use-after-move` in clang-tidy i saw,
>> that the check explicitly matches "std::move", but not "std::forward".
>> Since "std::forward" is a conditional move, shouldn't it be matched as
>> well, or is it implicitly caught?
>>
>> Regards, Jonas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>


-- 

Martin Böhme

Software Engineer

mboehme at google.com

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße 33
80363 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren Sie den Absender und
löschen Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.



This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do
not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail
including any attachments. Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170914/b6bb1094/attachment.html>