[cfe-dev] [RFC] Open sourcing and contributing TAPI back to the LLVM community
Saleem Abdulrasool via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 23 20:09:41 PDT 2017
I think it makes sense to have support for this input format in the tools.
Since the macOS SDK is slowly switching to this, having the tools work out
of the box is a nice feature. It is rather convenient having a single
toolset be sufficient to provide infrastructure for all the targets.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Juergen Ributzka via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> My experience has shown the same when it comes to header files and I am
> not claiming this is going to work out of the box for all library projects.
> It usually requires some cleanup first and that is why the tool comes with
> a verification mode to make sure the headers are the truth. Also keep in
> mind that you don't have to parse all the headers, but only the small set
> that get installed as part of the library API.
> The tool does not read the linker script / export file, because they are
> not necessarily the truth either and may have wildcards. In my view they
> are just one way of managing exported symbols. Another way, which I
> personally prefer, is to build with visibility hidden and annotate only the
> API with visibility default. That makes the headers the single source of
> what is API.
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
>> > InstallAPI:
>> > InstallAPI is a new build phase that generates the TBD file from header
>> > files only. This allows a dependency of the library to build
>> > even before the library has been built itself. This can be used to
>> > increase parallelism in the build or larger projects or operating
>> My experience is that headers don't necessarily form the best source of
>> truth about the API exported from a library. If you follow the Windows
>> model of marking exported APIs explicitly (declspec(dllexport) or
>> then okay, but that's a Windows extension and not common in other systems.
>> Linker scripts seem to be a more popular method; does the tool read linker
>> scripts to form the content of a TBD file?
>> Otherwise I'm not seeing a generic improvement in build parallelism.
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev