[cfe-dev] [ASTImporter][CrossTU] inconsistent enumerators
Gábor Horváth via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 16 08:42:06 PST 2017
Hi Rafael!
Yeah, the cross TU patch is a great way to detect issues with the
ASTImporter and unfortunately, those issues are extremely hard to debug.
Here, it looks like the source of the problem is that, when we import an
EnumConstantDecl, we will import the EnumDecl without the typdef part.
A dirty quick fix for this particular case:
@@ -1782,6 +1807,11 @@ Decl
*ASTNodeImporter::VisitEnumConstantDecl(EnumConstantDecl *D) {
DeclarationName Name;
SourceLocation Loc;
NamedDecl *ToD;
+ auto *ED = cast<EnumDecl>(D->getDeclContext());
+ if (auto *TND = ED->getTypedefNameForAnonDecl()) {
+ if (!Importer.Import(TND))
+ return nullptr;
+ }
if (ImportDeclParts(D, DC, LexicalDC, Name, ToD, Loc))
return nullptr;
if (ToD)
I did not have time yet to deep dive into this and look at what the proper
solution would be. Are you willing to continue to investigate this?
Regards,
Gábor
On 13 November 2017 at 12:16, Rafael·Stahl via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Deal all
>
> While using the static analyzer with cross translation unit support (
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691 ), I stumbled upon an issue that is most
> likely related to the ASTImporter.
>
> I'm using a custom checker, but this should be reproduced by just running
> the scan-build tool.
>
> A simple reproducing example:
>
> main.c:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> void foo();
> void moo();
>
> int main()
> {
> foo();
> moo();
> }
> ---------------------------------------
>
> foo.c:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> #include "thing.h"
>
> void foo()
> {
> (void)THING_VALUE;
> }
>
> void conflict(thing_t type)
> {
> }
> ---------------------------------------
>
> moo.c:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> #include "thing.h"
>
> void moo()
> {
> conflict(THING_VALUE);
> }
> ---------------------------------------
>
> thing.h:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> typedef enum {
> THING_VALUE
> } thing_t;
>
> void conflict(thing_t type);
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Notes on particularities of this example:
>
> - main.c needs to NOT include the header
> - main() needs to call the functions in this order
> - foo() needs to reference the enumerator
> - the enum needs to be typedef'd
>
> If any of the above points do not apply, the issue does not appear.
>
> The issue:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> In file included from moo.c:1:
> thing.h:1:9: warning: type 'thing_t' has incompatible
> definitions in different translation units [-Wodr]
> typedef enum {
> ^
> thing.h:2:5: note: enumerator 'THING_VALUE' with value 0 here
> THING_VALUE
> ^
> thing.h:1:9: note: no corresponding enumerator here
> foo.c:8:6: error: external function 'conflict' declared
> with incompatible types in different translation units ('void
> (thing_t)' vs. 'void (thing_t)')
> void conflict(thing_t type)
> ^
> thing.h:5:6: note: declared here with type
> 'void (thing_t)'
> void conflict(thing_t type);
> ^
> ---------------------------------------
>
> After importing conflict(thing_t) the ASTImporter compared the imported
> one with the original by structural equivalence. This reveals that in the
> imported enum the enumerators are missing, causing the above error.
>
> In my real code, not this example, I was unable to dump the imported
> EnumDecl, because it eventually calls SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit
> with two SourceLocations from different files. Not sure if this is related.
>
> I have tried adding:
>
> for (const auto Enumerator : D->enumerators())
> D2->addDecl(Importer.Import(Enumerator));
>
> before completing the definition in ASTNodeImporter::VisitEnumDecl(), but
> that results in:
>
> exe: tools/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1374: void
> clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*): Assertion
> `!D->getNextDeclInContext() && D != LastDecl && "Decl already inserted into
> a DeclContext"' failed.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with the ASTImporter to help myself further here.
> Does anyone know what could be the issue?
>
> Best regards
> Rafael Stahl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20171116/ea702834/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list