[cfe-dev] New flag for C++Next

[Piotr Padlewski via cfe-dev]

It is clear to me that it should be -std=c++-2ź.
But to be serious, it make sense to have some sort of -std=c++-next.
The other idea is that probably there won't be more than 3 standars in next
decade, so starting with C++2x should be sufficient.

Piotr


2017-03-07 17:57 GMT+01:00 Keane, Erich via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
:

> I don’t know personally, though googling doesn’t really give me any hint.
>
>
>
> Just thought maybe we could be the first to the punch here J
>
>
>
> *From:* Hubert Tong [mailto:hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 7, 2017 8:37 AM
> *To:* Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com>
> *Cc:* cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] New flag for C++Next
>
>
>
> Do we know what GCC is going to do?
>
> -- HT
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Keane, Erich via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> As many of you know, the committee sent C++17 for ISO approval, so any
> further features voted (including a few other extensions that we have) are
> likely targeted for a "C++20" or so.  I was wondering if there was going to
> be another 'temporary' flag (ala c++1x,y,z), and what it was going to be?
> Are we starting back over at 'x', continuing to 'a', or forgoing it
> entirely?
>
> -Erich
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170307/03ae01fb/attachment.html>