[cfe-dev] clang-format development discussion

[Manuel Klimek via cfe-dev]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:01 PM Rob Conde <rob.conde at ai-solutions.com>
wrote:

> Would patches which refactor for readability and debuggability be welcome?
>

If there is consensus that they do that, sure :)

>
> Rob
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 17, 2017 3:27:37 AM
> *To:* Rob Conde; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] clang-format development discussion
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:28 PM Rob Conde via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> clang-format development is fairly active, but I don't see much
>> development discussion on this list. Is there another list to join to get
>> more insight into this?
>>
>
> Nope, I think a lot of this is just people filing bugs and sending
> patches. If you find patches that should have been discussed on the list,
> just answer to the patches with that comment. Folks don't always get the
> split just right, so feedback is always good :)
>
>>
>> Rob Conde
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170717/3d46a705/attachment.html>