[cfe-dev] The state of Concepts in Clang

[Hubert Tong via cfe-dev]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Honermann <
Thomas.Honermann at synopsys.com> wrote:

> On 2/14/2017 10:24 AM, Hannes Hauswedell via cfe-dev wrote:
> > I previously planned designing concepts as variables and don't yet see
> > the added flexibility of the function interface as really important, but
> > I agree that it adds consistency to also have function concepts.
>
> I'll note that the Ranges proposal [1] exclusively specifies function
> concepts.
>
Which makes sense if you believe in overloading concept names.

There's a proposal (not yet reviewed by the committee) on (characterization
mine) being more conservative about how Concepts are in C++:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0587r0.pdf

-- HT


>
> Tom.
>
> [1]: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/n4620.pdf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170215/21f7d61e/attachment.html>