[cfe-dev] ClangD

[Manuel Klimek via cfe-dev]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:18 AM Mehdi Amini via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Benjamin Kramer via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Marco Craveiro via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
> If you have any thoughts / concerns let me know; otherwise look forward to
> code reviews on initial ClangD dropping by :D
>
>
> One minor point, which I could not spot on any of the replies: is it
> worth looking at RTags[1]? Its a libclang-based project with very good
> emacs integration. I've been using it daily on a large-ish code base
> and its pretty stable. Adding the MS protocol to it would probably be
> easier than starting from scratch. (I am in no way affiliated with the
> project, other than as a user).
>
> Also, the name ClangD seems to evoke D support for Clang :-)
>
>
> I've heard this from multiple people, so the official spelling should
> be clangd or Clangd in the traditional unix way ;)
>
>
> Trying to prevent future naming collision issue: clangd seems too generic
> to me and likely to collide with a general purpose clang `compilation
> server`, unless you plan to have a single `clangd` that can service
> multiple type of `service` (indexing, compiling, linking, …).
>

Compiling and linking is within scope. It is not yet clear in what form.


>
> —
> Mehdi
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170207/91febc45/attachment.html>