[cfe-dev] ClangD

[Benjamin Kramer via cfe-dev]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Marco Craveiro via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
>> If you have any thoughts / concerns let me know; otherwise look forward to
>> code reviews on initial ClangD dropping by :D
>
> One minor point, which I could not spot on any of the replies: is it
> worth looking at RTags[1]? Its a libclang-based project with very good
> emacs integration. I've been using it daily on a large-ish code base
> and its pretty stable. Adding the MS protocol to it would probably be
> easier than starting from scratch. (I am in no way affiliated with the
> project, other than as a user).
>
> Also, the name ClangD seems to evoke D support for Clang :-)

I've heard this from multiple people, so the official spelling should
be clangd or Clangd in the traditional unix way ;)

>
> My 0.02 Angolan Kwanzas.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Marco Craveiro
>
> MD, Domain Driven Consulting
> about: http://about.me/marcocraveiro
> blog: http://mcraveiro.blogspot.co.uk
> twitter: https://twitter.com/MarcoCraveiro
>
> That the Ideas are themselves manifestations (of the Idea-Idea) and
> that the Idea-Idea is a-kind-of Manifestation-Idea—which is a-kind-of
> itself, so that the system is completely self-describing— would have
> been appreciated by Plato as an extremely practical joke [Plato]. --
> Alan Key
>
> [1] https://github.com/Andersbakken/rtags/
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev