[cfe-dev] Setting default dialect to C++11

[Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev]

Doh! Hadn't looked at cfe-commits yet, and now I see you posted
D40948.
--paulr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robinson, Paul
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2017 10:18 AM
> To: Robinson, Paul; Tim Northover
> Cc: Richard Smith; Martin J. O'Riordan; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: RE: [cfe-dev] Setting default dialect to C++11
> 
> Hi Tim, given that the holidays are coming up and Hans is proposing
> to branch 6.0.0 on 3 January, seems like we'd want to get this done
> in the next couple of weeks?  Let me know if you need any help.
> Thanks,
> --paulr
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
> > Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:40 PM
> > To: Tim Northover
> > Cc: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; Richard Smith; Martin J. O'Riordan
> > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Setting default dialect to C++11
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Northover [mailto:t.p.northover at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 12:54 PM
> > > To: Robinson, Paul
> > > Cc: Mehdi AMINI; Richard Smith; Martin J. O'Riordan; cfe-
> > > dev at lists.llvm.org
> > > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Setting default dialect to C++11
> > >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > On 15 November 2017 at 19:21, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Tim, I was wondering how this is going, and whether you might
> > > > need any help.
> > >
> > > A very well-deserved "hint hint", I think!
> > >
> > > I think that all of the actual Clang changes are in place now and I
> > > have a patch to flip the switch (attached for interest).
> > >
> > > The test-suite needed a handful of build changes to compile and I've
> > > not yet fixed the externals up. After that I can run tests on Linux &
> > > Darwin platforms, but it might be good if someone can do a quick
> > > once-over on Windows.
> >
> > I just did this for clang on Windows, and the list of tests that failed
> > is the same as the list of tests updated in your patch.  I'm not set up
> > with test-suite so you're on your own there.
> >
> > I am not persuaded that all of the clang test changes are what we'd
> > really want, but at least there aren't any new ones ready to bite you.
> > If you want to put the patch up as a Phab review I can put my comments
> > on it and you can tell me how wrong I am. :-)
> > --paulr
> >
> > >
> > > I think we could get this settled in a week or so (modulo
> > > thanksgiving; I'm still working but things might get pretty sedate in
> > > the US).
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > > Tim.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev