[cfe-dev] A new clang-based documentation tool

[陳韋任 via cfe-dev]

Hi Athos,

  My impression is we usually name the tool with dash in between, like
clang-diff, clang-format, ... etc.
IMHO, clang-doxygen will be good as it remind me it tends to replace doxygen.

Regards,
chenwj

2017-08-01 17:27 GMT+08:00 Athos van Kralingen via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> I’d like to let you know that we’re currently working on a documentation
> tool as a replacement to Doxygen. It’s all still work in progress, but it’s
> getting to the point where it will be actually usable for projects. Compared
> to Doxygen, we’re trying to give some significant improvements with regard
> to the output and control thereof, as well as improve integration with build
> systems for incremental builds and distribution. Of course this is all using
> Clang behind the scenes. Within time, we will be open-sourcing it and will
> definitely need some hands to keep the project going, as well as to, for
> example, extend Clang’s Doxygen parser.
>
>
>
> However, before we get to that point, we are concerned with something
> slightly off topic: the name, of which the tool currently does not have one.
> We had ClangDoc/clangdoc in mind, but we’re wondering about the general
> consensus of naming Clang-based tooling after Clang itself? Is there
> anything against that?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Athos
>
>
>
> Junior Tools Programmer
>
> Guerrilla
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>



-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj