[cfe-dev] Is Clang 3.6 still supported as host compiler for libcxx?

[Renato Golin via cfe-dev]

On 28 October 2016 at 20:43, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> My 2 cents are that libc++ is special, and can't be held to LLVM/Clang's
> requirements. Implementing C++17 libraries with compilers shipped in 2014 is
> tricky.

This would make building Clang and libc++ more complicated.

Or we can keep the minimum requirement still the same (as Clang), only
compile libc++ on stage-2, and make it easy for people to do so in
CMake.

cheers,
--renato