[cfe-dev] Address space extensions (adding type modifier keywords)
Daniel Marjamäki via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 13 23:18:43 PDT 2016
Hello!
I am not an expert. But I think you should use address space attributes. This code compiles without errors:
#define xstglocal __attribute__((address_space(0)))
#define xstgblock __attribute__((address_space(256)))
#define xstgglobal __attribute__((address_space(257)))
int* xstglocal lp_i; // Local pointer to any integer
int* xstgblock b_pi; // Block pointer to any integer
int* xstgglobal g_pi; // Global pointer to any integer
xstgglobal int* xstglocal vp_li; // Local pointer to global integer
xstglocal int* xstgblock vp_bi; // Block pointer to local integer
xstgblock int* xstgglobal vp_gi; // Global pointer to block integer
Best regards,
Daniel Marjamäki
..................................................................................................................
Daniel Marjamäki Senior Engineer
Evidente ES East AB Warfvinges väg 34 SE-112 51 Stockholm Sweden
Mobile: +46 (0)709 12 42 62
E-mail: Daniel.Marjamaki<mailto:Daniel.Marjamaki at evidente.se>@evidente.se<mailto:Daniel.Marjamaki at evidente.se>
www.evidente.se
________________________________
From: cfe-dev [cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Phil Tomson via cfe-dev [cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org]
Sent: 14 October 2016 03:35
To: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: [cfe-dev] Address space extensions (adding type modifier keywords)
Our architecture has a somewhat different memory model with three different address spaces: local, block, global.
Some time ago (prior to my involvement in our project) our address space extensions were added to the frontend so that we can write:
volatile int v_i;
xstglocal int l_i;
xstgblock int b_i;
xstgglobal int g_i;
volatile int* p_vi; // Regular pointer to volatile integer
xstglocal int* p_li; // Regular pointer to local integer
xstgblock int* b_pi; // Regular pointer to block integer
xstgglobal int* g_pi; // Regular pointer to global integer
int* volatile vp_i; // Volatile pointer to regular integer
These address space modifiers (xstglocal, xstgblock, xstgglobal) are used to determine which address space data is stored in. The above will compile just fine.
However, originally this work was done for clang/llvm 3.2. After we moved to 3.6 we found that the following (which used to work in 3.2) no longer works in 3.6:
int* xstglocal lp_i; // Local pointer to any integer
int* xstgblock b_pi; // Block pointer to any integer
int* xstgglobal g_pi; // Global pointer to any integer
xstgglobal int* xstglocal vp_li; // Local pointer to global integer
xstglocal int* xstgblock vp_bi; // Block pointer to local integer
xstgblock int* xstgglobal vp_gi; // Global pointer to block integer
These result in front end errors:
issue.c:13:7: error: expected identifier or '('
int * xstglocal lp_i; // Local pointer to any integer
^
issue.c:14:7: error: expected identifier or '('
int * xstgblock b_pi; // Block pointer to any integer
^
issue.c:15:7: error: expected identifier or '('
int * xstgglobal g_pi; // Global pointer to any integer
^
issue.c:20:18: error: expected identifier or '('
xstgglobal int * xstglocal vp_li; // Local pointer to global integer
^
issue.c:21:18: error: expected identifier or '('
xstglocal int * xstgblock vp_bi; // Block pointer to local integer
^
issue.c:22:18: error: expected identifier or '('
xstgblock int * xstgglobal vp_gi; // Global pointer to block integer
^
6 errors generated.
It looks as though these address space extension keywords were added in
TokenKinds.def:
// XSTG address space qualifiers
KEYWORD(xstgglobal , KEYXSTG)
KEYWORD(xstgblock , KEYXSTG)
KEYWORD(xstglocal , KEYXSTG)
As well as in Attr.td:
def XSTGLocalAddressSpace : TypeAttr {
let Spellings = [Keyword<"xstglocal">];
let Documentation = [Undocumented];
}
def XSTGBlockAddressSpace : TypeAttr {
let Spellings = [Keyword<"xstgblock">];
let Documentation = [Undocumented];
}
def XSTGGlobalAddressSpace : TypeAttr {
let Spellings = [Keyword<"xstgglobal">];
let Documentation = [Undocumented];
}
with some support in ParseDecl.cpp.
Was there an API change between clang 3.2 and 3.6 that might have broken this? Any pointers on how I might fix these errors?
Thanks.
Phil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20161014/3c3a1790/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list