[cfe-dev] clang-format indents template methods with ref-qualification + noexcept wrongly.

Han Wang via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 6 01:02:16 PDT 2016


It's windows installer based on SVN r282394 (26 September 2016).

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Kirill Bobyrev <kbobyrev.lists at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please at least specify major version of clang-format. Mine handles this
> piece of code just fine (4.0-dev r283306).
>
>> Kirill
>
> On 5 Oct 2016, at 18:30, Han Wang via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry the semicolon is missing at the end of class definition but it
> doesn't change the result.
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Han Wang <wanghan02 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's say we have a simple template method with ref-qualification and
>> noexcept.
>>
>> struct A {
>>   template <typename T>
>>   void foo(T&& t) & noexcept {
>>     DoSomething();
>>     DoSomethingElse();
>>   }
>> }
>>
>> If we use clang-format to re-format the code with google style (or llvm
>> or other styles), we get
>>
>> struct A {
>>   template <typename T>
>>       void foo(T&& t) & noexcept {
>>     DoSomething();
>>     DoSomethingElse();
>>   }
>> }
>>
>> If we remove the noexcept or if we put a const before ref-qualification
>> the reformat will work correctly.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20161006/b6740043/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list