[cfe-dev] Inherited members/functions in CXXRecordDecl

[David Come via cfe-dev]

I'm a a bit puzzled. Because clang  has to know about these attributes 
later on (for looking up the symbol if used, or when computing the class 
size).

it means somewhere it's done, I don't know where =/


Thanks.

David


On 15/11/2016 15:30, David Blaikie wrote:
> I would expect you'd have to look at the base class, yes - the AST is, 
> at least somewhat, a syntax tree, representing the code as written.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:41 AM David Come via cfe-dev 
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>
>     I'm using clang and libtooling 3.9 to parse some C++ code.
>
>     With the following snippet :
>
>     struct A0  {
>        char* p;
>        void Z();
>     };
>     struct A : A0{
>        const int i;
>        volatile double g;
>     protected:
>        void f(){};
>     };
>
>     When iterating over fields and methods on A's CXXRecordDecl in my
>     visitor,
>
>     I only get fields i and g ; and method f. I completely miss p and Z.
>
>
>     Is this normal ? How can I get them when looking at A's
>     CXXRecordDecl ?
>     Do I have to iterate over A base classes and add A0's public/protected
>     members ?
>
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     David Come
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cfe-dev mailing list
>     cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>     http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20161116/3707d809/attachment.html>