[cfe-dev] [buildbots][libunwind] Why is libunwind not built / tested on most bots?

[Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev]

Thanks both!

Patch here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20781

Mostly trivial, will commit if there's no objection.

/ Asiri

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:

> You can also put it on one of my bots. Try to pick the one with the least
> bots on it currently.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Asiri Rathnayake
>> <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I could add a use-libunwind configuration to an existing x86 bot (ARM
>> bot
>> > already tests the llvm unwinder), and leave the rest of the bots alone
>> (so
>> > that they continue to test the gcc unwinder).
>> >
>> > Can I have the permission from one of the x86_64 bot libcxx maintainers?
>>
>> You have my full permission to add more jobs to gribozavr* bots.
>>
>> Dmitri
>>
>> --
>> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
>> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160529/24a7901a/attachment.html>