[cfe-dev] [buildbots][libunwind] Why is libunwind not built / tested on most bots?

[Saleem Abdulrasool via cfe-dev]

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Dmitri Gribenko via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Asiri Rathnayake
> <Asiri.Rathnayake at arm.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While going through the list of buildbots for libcxx [1], I realized
> that only the arm buildbot (Renato) is setup to build+test libunwind [2].
> None of the other bots seem to pass the -DLIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER=ON
> option. They all seem to checkout the sources but then forgets about
> libunwind.
> >
> > Is this an intentional omission? If not, I think it would be good to
> make them build+test libunwind as well, I don't think it adds a lot of
> overhead. I can update the bot configurations if you are all happy with
> allowing libunwind testing.
>
> No objections from me, but I think it would be better to test both
> configurations (with and without the LLVM libunwind).
>

+1 on this.  I think we should be testing with libunwind and
libgcc/libgcc_eh.  That will also help ensure that we don't accidentally
start relying on extensions.


> Dmitri
>
> --
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>



-- 
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160528/f337c035/attachment.html>