[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 4 17:08:44 PDT 2016
This sounds good to me.
I have planned the update.
Thanks
Galina
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Mike Edwards via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Chris,
> We have upgrade our bots (both internal and external) to CMake 3.5.2. So
> we are good to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Renato,
>>
>> This approach sounds great to me.
>>
>> Chris M let me know separately that GreenDragon is on CMake 3.5.
>>
>> I belive Galina and Takumi maintain the largest chunk of remaining public
>> bots. Do either of you have any thoughts on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Chris
>>
>> > On May 3, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 3 May 2016 at 17:07, Chris Bieneman via cfe-dev
>> > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> Since there seems to be no strong objections remaining I’d like to
>> propose the following timeline and process:
>> >>
>> >> 4/23 - I will send another follow-up email reminding everyone of this
>> change and timeline
>> >> 4/30 - I will send a final notice an hour before making the change to
>> the LLVM, Clang, Compiler-RT, Clang-Tools-Extra, LibCXX, LibCXXABI and
>> Test-Suite repos
>> >>
>> >> During the week of 4/30 I will revert as necessary if bots fail.
>> Hopefully having the change permanently landed by the middle of the week.
>> >>
>> >> Does this sound agreeable to everyone?
>> >
>> > I'd like to propose a different approach. How about we do this the
>> > other way around? Maybe we should try the "move first, fix later",
>> > than the "break first, despair later".
>> >
>> > This week we (Linaro) have finished our buildbot migration, all of
>> > them running on CMake 3.4.3. I'd like to see if other bot maintainers
>> > could take the same effort before a certain date.
>> >
>> > So, we can still have the same dates (in May, of course), but with
>> > different "labels":
>> >
>> > Soon, you send an announcement:
>> > * Saying the consensus is to move to CMake 3.4.3 as well as a
>> > compiled CMake for all platforms,
>> > * That the technical reason is strong enough to do so, even if it
>> > incurs more work to some people,
>> > * That *ALL* bot owners should migrate as soon as possible (no later
>> > than 30th).
>> >
>> > On 23rd, you send a reminder to the list informing all bot owners that
>> > time is running out.
>> > * If they can't do it, who could help them
>> > * If they need push in the CMake community, or a new stable release,
>> > it's better to have it now than then
>> >
>> > On 30th, you do the migration as you proposed.
>> >
>> > It's all the same, but with the difference that we're involving all
>> > bot owners, and hopefully not having to revert too many times such a
>> > troublesome change (CMake changes always mess up the bots anyway).
>> >
>> > Anyway, for ARM/AArch64, we're good to go.
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > --renato
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160504/0ebfde4f/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list