[cfe-dev] Any objections to re-sorting #include lines with clang-format/clang-tidy?

[Philip Reames via cfe-dev]

+1

On 03/11/2016 01:14 AM, Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev wrote:
> The crazy clang-format folks have taught it to sort includes, and 
> clang-tidy has a nice way to run it across all of LLVM and Clang.
>
> Before I just submit the fixes (and any bug reports to the 
> clang-format folks if it sorts things weirdly) I wanted to double 
> check that folks would be ok with this. My understanding is that the 
> sorting should match the LLVM conventions, but if not, I'll make sure 
> to get that fixed first.
>
> -Chandler
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160311/09b54d4e/attachment.html>