[cfe-dev] FullSourceLoc, getSpellingLineNumber segmentation fault
victor via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 1 06:39:18 PST 2016
Hi again,
I have carried out what I told you about taking the CXXMemberCallExpr node before calling "getSpellingLineNumber" (in case there is a parent of the MemberExpr object of this type). That worked, but I'm in doubt because I don't know wether this "patch" scales or not for other programs. Furthermore, I don't know if I should take care of other similar situations...
From: mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:16:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] FullSourceLoc, getSpellingLineNumber segmentation fault
To: pedretti_86 at hotmail.com
CC: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Hi,
I used to face a lot of crashes on this method, it would usually explode at some #__SSE2__ code in a static method called ComputeLineNumbers inside clang.
Are you using virtual files? Are you generating the AST more than once (I mean, calling Tool.BuildAST() more than once)?
I don't quite remember how I fixed, but I _think_ those two might have something to do with the problem.
Cheers,
2016-02-29 18:22 GMT+00:00 victor via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
Hi,
Does somebody know what can make the method getSpellingLineNumber from FullSourceLoc to generate a segmentation fault? I'm using clang 3.6.
http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1FullSourceLoc.html#a52927fcf23cf662c209e5e996bf59917
Before using this method, I have checked that the FullSourceLoc is valid. This is the code:
if(loc.isValid()){
if(!(loc.getFileID().isInvalid())){
if(Context->getSourceManager().getFileEntryForID(loc.getFileID()) != NULL){
unsigned int = loc.getSpellingLineNumber();
}
}
}
I can't find anything special in the code which I'm using to check if my program works:
void DeleteNode( XMLNode* node ) {
node->_parent->DeleteChild( node );
}
And this is the tree:
| | |-CXXMethodDecl 0x26b4090 <line:1576:5, line:1578:5> line:1576:10 DeleteNode 'void (class tinyxml2::XMLNode *)'
| | | |-ParmVarDecl 0x26b4010 <col:22, col:31> col:31 used node 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *'
| | | |-CompoundStmt 0x26c9500 <col:38, line:1578:5>
| | | | `-CXXMemberCallExpr 0x26c94b8 <line:1577:9, col:42> 'void'
| | | | |-MemberExpr 0x26c9460 <col:9, col:24> '<bound member function type>' ->DeleteChild 0x2699420
| | | | | `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x26c9448 <col:9, col:15> 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | | | `-MemberExpr 0x26c9418 <col:9, col:15> 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *' lvalue ->_parent 0x269a310
| | | | | `-ImplicitCastExpr 0x26c9400 <col:9> 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | | | `-DeclRefExpr 0x26c93d8 <col:9> 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *' lvalue ParmVar 0x26b4010 'node' 'class tinyxml2::XMLNode *'
The object "loc" contains the location of the MemberExpr "_parent".
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
--
Mikhail Ramalho.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160301/1099964a/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list