[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

[Anton Korobeynikov via cfe-dev]

>> I think that this is the right approach, and we happen to have a natural
>> forcing function here: opaque pointer types. I think we should increment the
>> major version number when opaque pointer types are here, as it will be a
>> major breaking change, and then we'll have a version 4.0. Until then, unless
>> something else breaking comes up, 3.10 sounds fine to me.
> +1, complete agreement.
Agree


-- 
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University