[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
Eric Fiselier via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 12 11:31:53 PDT 2016
> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running
check-all.
What tests are failing?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing
> two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were
> present in 3.8.0, am I supposed to file bug reports for them?
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Sanders via Release-testers <
> release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal
>> error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain.
>>
>> FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils
>> 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently
>> running the tests.
>>
>> Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link:
>> cd
>> "/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers"
>> && /usr/bin/g++-5 -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_OBJC_REWRITER
>> -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
>> -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers"
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers"
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/tools/clang/include"
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/include"
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/include"
>> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/include" -std=c++0x -fPIC
>> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings
>> -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
>> -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -std=c++11
>> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual
>> -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -o
>> CMakeFiles/clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers.dir/FixedAddressChecker.cpp.o -c
>> "/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/FixedAddressChecker.cpp"
>> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.26 internal error, aborting
>> at ../../bfd/merge.c:909 in _bfd_merged_section_offset
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug.
>>
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Release-testers [release-testers-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf
>> of Sylvestre Ledru via Release-testers [release-testers at lists.llvm.org]
>> Sent: 09 June 2016 17:08
>> To: Tom Stellard; release-testers at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org;
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> Subject: Re: [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
>>
>> Le 08/06/2016 à 06:12, Tom Stellard via Release-testers a écrit :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've tagged 3.8.1-rc1, testers can begin testing.
>> Green on most of the Debian main archs:
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8&suite=experimental
>> The armel & mipsel build issue are not regressions from 3.8 (but are
>> from 3.7)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sylvestre
>> _______________________________________________
>> Release-testers mailing list
>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Release-testers mailing list
>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160612/b12f5d67/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list