[cfe-dev] Clang on Windows fails to detect trivial double free in static analysis

Reid Kleckner via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 12 14:18:55 PST 2016


Jordan, how do we enable this checker on Windows?

We shouldn't need to be able to parse SAL to do this analysis.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 10:31 PM, <Alexander G. Riccio> via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Is it because the checker is *unix*.malloc
> <http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/available_checks.html#unix_checkers>? If
> so, that's actually quite terrible... why only check it on unix??
>
> Sincerely,
> Alexander Riccio
> --
> "Change the world or go home."
> about.me/ariccio
>
> <http://about.me/ariccio>
> If left to my own devices, I will build more.
>>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM, <Alexander G. Riccio> <test35965 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> When I build the attached C program in windows, using Clang built from a
>> very recent tree version (trunk 256686), Clang fails to detect the trivial
>> double free, as evidenced in the resulting plist file (attached).
>>
>> What's going on here? I have a gut feeling that it has something to do
>> with Clang's ignorance of SAL, which allows MSVC to detect the condition
>> generically:
>>
>> void __cdecl free(
>>     _Pre_maybenull_ _Post_invalid_ void* _Block
>>     );
>>
>> (from C:/Program Files (x86)/Windows
>> Kits/10/Include/10.0.10240.0/ucrt/corecrt_malloc.h)
>>
>> I'm also attaching the verbose compilation output.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Alexander Riccio
>> --
>> "Change the world or go home."
>> about.me/ariccio
>>
>> <http://about.me/ariccio>
>> If left to my own devices, I will build more.
>>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160112/4b944bb0/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list