[cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang

[Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev]

Yeah, just got confused with an old email. Disregard :)

-Tanya

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Er, I see both Justin's response, and you saying "Done"?
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:26 PM Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> I did not see a response to this. Please let me know if I missed it.
> 
> -Tanya
> 
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 11:52 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> CUDA component under what Product? 
>> 
>> I’ll also need below. However, I can use the defaults for the product you put it under for default assignee and cc list if you don’t have someone. Usually its a dummy assignee and the llvmbugs list.
>> Component Description:	
>> Default Assignee:	
>> Default CC List:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Tanya
>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com <mailto:jlebar at google.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +Tanya, Anton, who may be able to effect this.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Justin Lebar via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>>>>> To: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
>>>>> Cc: "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 2:58:10 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess this would let us watch the CUDA component for new bugs,
>>>>> which
>>>>> scales better than hoping that people cc the right people.  I'm
>>>>> onboard with that.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, please add a new component. We've been bad about this, historically, but that's no excuse to not be better going forward.
>>>> 
>>>> -Hal
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jingyue Wu via cfe-dev
>>>>>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com <mailto:jlebar at google.com>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I was about to +1 this, but then I looked through the existing
>>>>>>>> list of
>>>>>>>> components, and it doesn't seem that there are components for
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> similarly-sized projects, like OpenMP or whatever.  So maybe we
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> just get by with putting "CUDA" in the summary?  Bugzilla search
>>>>>>>> sucks, but even it can handle this.  :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Actually, OpenMP is a separate "product" in the Bugzilla, even
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> high-level than "component".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Right, but it also covers the runtime implementation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am fine with squeezing CUDA bugs in C++. I was just confused
>>>>>>> when I
>>>>>>> searched through the list and didn't find a place for CUDA bugs.
>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>> rename "C++" to "C++/CUDA"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Hal Finkel
>>>> Assistant Computational Scientist
>>>> Leadership Computing Facility
>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160226/6149c85b/attachment.html>