[cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang

[Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev]

I did not see a response to this. Please let me know if I missed it.

-Tanya

> On Feb 8, 2016, at 11:52 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> CUDA component under what Product? 
> 
> I’ll also need below. However, I can use the defaults for the product you put it under for default assignee and cc list if you don’t have someone. Usually its a dummy assignee and the llvmbugs list.
> Component Description:	
> Default Assignee:	
> Default CC List:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Tanya
> 
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com <mailto:jlebar at google.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> +Tanya, Anton, who may be able to effect this.
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Justin Lebar via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>>>> To: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
>>>> Cc: "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 2:58:10 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang
>>>> 
>>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>>> 
>>>> I guess this would let us watch the CUDA component for new bugs,
>>>> which
>>>> scales better than hoping that people cc the right people.  I'm
>>>> onboard with that.
>>> 
>>> Yes, please add a new component. We've been bad about this, historically, but that's no excuse to not be better going forward.
>>> 
>>> -Hal
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jingyue Wu via cfe-dev
>>>>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com <mailto:jlebar at google.com>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was about to +1 this, but then I looked through the existing
>>>>>>> list of
>>>>>>> components, and it doesn't seem that there are components for
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> similarly-sized projects, like OpenMP or whatever.  So maybe we
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> just get by with putting "CUDA" in the summary?  Bugzilla search
>>>>>>> sucks, but even it can handle this.  :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually, OpenMP is a separate "product" in the Bugzilla, even
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> high-level than "component".
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Right, but it also covers the runtime implementation.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am fine with squeezing CUDA bugs in C++. I was just confused
>>>>>> when I
>>>>>> searched through the list and didn't find a place for CUDA bugs.
>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>> rename "C++" to "C++/CUDA"?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Hal Finkel
>>> Assistant Computational Scientist
>>> Leadership Computing Facility
>>> Argonne National Laboratory
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160226/57ce5643/attachment.html>