[cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang

[Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev]

CUDA component under what Product? 

I’ll also need below. However, I can use the defaults for the product you put it under for default assignee and cc list if you don’t have someone. Usually its a dummy assignee and the llvmbugs list.
Component Description:	
Default Assignee:	
Default CC List:




-Tanya

> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote:
> 
> +Tanya, Anton, who may be able to effect this.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Justin Lebar via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> To: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com>
>>> Cc: "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 2:58:10 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang
>>> 
>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>> 
>>> I guess this would let us watch the CUDA component for new bugs,
>>> which
>>> scales better than hoping that people cc the right people.  I'm
>>> onboard with that.
>> 
>> Yes, please add a new component. We've been bad about this, historically, but that's no excuse to not be better going forward.
>> 
>> -Hal
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jingyue Wu via cfe-dev
>>>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was about to +1 this, but then I looked through the existing
>>>>>> list of
>>>>>> components, and it doesn't seem that there are components for
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> similarly-sized projects, like OpenMP or whatever.  So maybe we
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> just get by with putting "CUDA" in the summary?  Bugzilla search
>>>>>> sucks, but even it can handle this.  :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually, OpenMP is a separate "product" in the Bugzilla, even
>>>>> more
>>>>> high-level than "component".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Right, but it also covers the runtime implementation.
>>>> 
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am fine with squeezing CUDA bugs in C++. I was just confused
>>>>> when I
>>>>> searched through the list and didn't find a place for CUDA bugs.
>>>>> Maybe
>>>>> rename "C++" to "C++/CUDA"?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Hal Finkel
>> Assistant Computational Scientist
>> Leadership Computing Facility
>> Argonne National Laboratory

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160208/a26fc166/attachment.html>