[cfe-dev] Bugzilla Component for CUDA Bugs in Clang

[Justin Lebar via cfe-dev]

> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.

I guess this would let us watch the CUDA component for new bugs, which
scales better than hoping that people cc the right people.  I'm
onboard with that.

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jingyue Wu via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was about to +1 this, but then I looked through the existing list of
>>> components, and it doesn't seem that there are components for other
>>> similarly-sized projects, like OpenMP or whatever.  So maybe we can
>>> just get by with putting "CUDA" in the summary?  Bugzilla search
>>> sucks, but even it can handle this.  :)
>>
>>
>> Actually, OpenMP is a separate "product" in the Bugzilla, even more
>> high-level than "component".
>
>
> Right, but it also covers the runtime implementation.
>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> I am fine with squeezing CUDA bugs in C++. I was just confused when I
>> searched through the list and didn't find a place for CUDA bugs. Maybe
>> rename "C++" to "C++/CUDA"?
>
>
> I'd vote for a new CUDA component.