[cfe-dev] Fiddling the Rewriter tests (anyone still care about Objective-C/C++?)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Dec 11 15:27:13 PST 2016
> On 2016-Dec-08, at 07:33, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nat! [mailto:nat at mulle-kybernetik.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 1:31 AM
>> To: Robinson, Paul
>> Cc: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Fiddling the Rewriter tests (anyone still care
>> about Objective-C/C++?)
>>
>> Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev schrieb:
>>> Privately, we set the default C++ dialect to C++11. This causes all
>>> kinds of fun with the Clang tests, and Charles Li has been doing a lot
>>> of work to make the tests able to tolerate C++11. I'm helping out a
>>> little bit.
>>>
>>> Specifically I'm looking at the Rewriter tests. It looks like these
>>> take Objective-C/C++ input, generate a non-Objective equivalent, and
>>> then compile the resulting C++ to make sure it's clean. There are
>>> 32 tests that fail in the "compile the resulting C++" stage, when we
>>> set the default dialect to C++11.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that Objective-C/C++ is kind of passe, so nobody is really
>>> interested in modernizing it (or the C++ that the rewriter produces).
>>> Therefore I'm proposing to simply add '-std=gnu++98' to the failing
>> tests,
>>> and be done with it.
>>>
>>> Anybody mind if I do this?
>>> Thanks,
>>> --paulr
>>>
>>
>> Hi Paul
>>
>>
>> If you look at "lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp#1531" or so, you
>> will see that the language set for most ObjC runtimes is gnu++98.
>>
>> case IK_CXX:
>> case IK_PreprocessedCXX:
>> case IK_ObjCXX:
>> case IK_PreprocessedObjCXX:
>> LangStd = LangStandard::lang_gnucxx98;
>> break;
>>
>> So if the test somehow ignore this, then -std=gnu++98' sounds sensible
>> to me. Hope this helps. I myself have never used the Rewriter.
>
> Hi Nat! What we do privately is something like this:
>
> case IK_CXX:
> case IK_PreprocessedCXX:
> LangStd = LangStandard::lang_cxx11;
> break;
> case IK_ObjCXX:
> case IK_PreprocessedObjCXX:
> LangStd = LangStandard::lang_gnucxx98;
> break;
>
>
> The tests I am looking at all do something like this:
>
> RUN: %clang_cc1 -x objective-c++ ... %s -o %t.cpp
> RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only ... %t.cpp
>
> That is, rewrite the objective-c++ source, then compile the result.
>
> So, the objective-c++ part is implicitly compiled with -std=gnu++98,
> but then (for me) the C++ part is implicitly compiled -std=c++11.
> What I am doing is adding -std=gnu++98 to the C++ part.
Paul, your proposal SGTM. Go ahead, and thanks for the cleanup.
>
> Thanks,
> --paulr
>
>>
>> Ciao
>> Nat!
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list