[cfe-dev] Regression in Release Candidate 2

[Dan Walmsley via cfe-dev]

Hi Renato,
   Ok so far I have tested with RC1 and RC2 they both show the regression.
   Ok I will try to create a repo and get back in touch.
Thanks
Dan

> From: renato.golin at linaro.org
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:39:56 +0100
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Regression in Release Candidate 2
> To: dan at walms.co.uk
> CC: hans at chromium.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> 
> On 24 August 2016 at 11:56, Dan Walmsley via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed a regression in this build...
> >
> > libclang, code completeAt...
> > the results returned inbuilt libraries, i.e. memset
> >
> > all come back as char* functionname( void)
> >
> > if I go back to older build (3.7.1) then this information returns.
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Can you narrow down the problem a bit more?
> 
> Is this only with the RC2? Or also with RC1? Does it work with 3.8.0
> or 3.8.1? Some version of trunk?
> 
> Also, that is a *very* high level description of the problem and it's
> really hard to reproduce it. This may be a problem in backwards
> compatibility of libclang (which shouldn't happen), or it could be
> that the completeAt usage was assuming something that wasn't true.
> 
> If you could create a bug explaining the process, stating the most
> recent version that you can see it working, and how to reproduce
> without any additional tools (ie. by using libclang directly,
> preferably with a piece of code that does it), then Clang folks could
> have a better look at that.
> 
> cheers,
> --renato
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160824/df0f107f/attachment.html>